WARNING: Both spoilers and strong feelings from the writer
will be expressed in this review. The fact that Annelisee Michel was a real
person seems to be the last thing on the filmmakers’ minds and I will offer
none of the mercies I give to other movie-makers who are only doing their jobs
and sometimes failing. This. This is different.
SYNOPSIS: A bit of fan-ficcy historical fiction is afoot
when a camera crew and a group of “scientists” appear at the house of Annelisse
Michel. If you are unaware of who Miss Michel was, an easy google search will
provide you with sufficient data. In short, she was an epileptic woman who
developed psychosis tied with her deeply religious beliefs. The pain became
demons and her death became martyrdom. This is the same case that inspired the
2005 blockbuster The Exorcism of Emily
Rose and the lesser known, superior German drama called Requiem. Both of those films are worth
your time and I recommend them, especially the beautifully done and exquisitely
acted Requiem, a film that not only
poses questions but proposes some answers to the real life tragedy of a
suffering young woman. In that film, the priest and doctors are shown in a fair
light.
Fair light is not something you will have much of in
“Annelisse.” Both figuratively and literally. Since when I do these reviews I
keep a simple grading system to determine how I rate the movie, I found myself
sinking it despite looking for redeeming qualities. This time I will share the
process with you because it suddenly became hilarious how spectacularly this
film failed in every point.
You begin with a score of 100, no matter what movie you are.
You made a movie. That gets you an A for pure effort. And, believe it or
not, I am incredibly nice when it comes to things I do not personally like. I
suppose as a creator myself I understand and appreciate the incredible effort
that goes into preparing just one piece of artwork. So here is how this review
will be done. First I will go through the synopsis and share with you when the
film makes mistakes with all the glee of your evil Third-Grade English teacher.
Second, we will go through the “Possession Flick Score Board” to see how many
needless clichés the film hits. (I usually forgive a cliché if they work well.
Which is rare. Then we see if they get any Grace Points by bringing something
new to the table.)
Ready for this? Here we go.
Not only does this film open with the erroneous claim that
this is “found footage” and that the scenes have not been doctored, but even the description of the movie is
incorrect: “The case that inspired the
1970s blockbuster films.” The title, “The Exorcist Tapes,” implies that the
Michel case inspired the movie The
Exorcist.
But add this up.
- The Exorcist came out in 1973.
- Anneliesse’s case happened in 1976.
- You lose points for insulting your audience’s intelligence and getting your facts so screwed up you cannot even catch what bullshit you are trying to pass off as bullshit, Bullshit. (-1)
- That’s a lot of Bullshit. Penn and Teller need to do an entire episode about this movie.
Right away the editing of the scenes do not do the movie any
favors. This does not, at any point, look like a documentary from the ‘70s.
(-1) The group of “scientists” with camera crew arrive to film Annelisse for a
“study” into epileptic psychosis. Or at least that is what her German doctor
says. No subtitles provided for the German spoken in this film. Why not, I do
not know but it becomes distracting very quickly because everyone besides
Annelisse’s actual doctor are Americans. Highly unlikely. (-1) American
scientists and camera crew visiting a German family with German priests and a German
doctor, with the Americans being the voice of reason. Oh boy. Not even 10
minutes in and we have the White American Savior Complex already in effect.
(-1) They want to film the supposedly possessed girl, though it is unclear how
this is even legal. There is a study
exploiting a patient without her or her parents’ consent. The German doctor
mentions a “contract” of some sort but that never explains why the parents fail
to call the police and have these assholes taken out of their house. I am
fairly sure that filming a documentary in someone’s house who does not comply
with it is illegal as well, regardless of some medical contract bullshit. That is
home invasion. I’m pretty sure it’s illegal to stay and film an exorcism
without the patient, the patient’s guardians and the Church’s consent. Yeah,
this just would not have happened. (-1)
Things become “creepy” right away when the doctors see a
pale and sleep-deprived Annelisse standing around, unresponsive to questions. Because
nothing is scarier than women who do not follow instructions, am I right? She
then pisses on the floor in true Exorcist-fashion.
But she does that film one better by dropping to the floor and playing in the
urine, licking it and grinning wickedly as she does so. Besides being gross
this gives us nothing, honestly. All it does is validate her doctor’s
suggestion that she go back to the hospital. But Annelisse’s priest argues that
the doctors had her for two years and she did not improve. Ergo, she needs an
ancient ritual of driving out negative forces by yelling things at her
repeatedly until she stops…being crazy. Perfect.
"The chemo therapy you have been undergoing for two years hasn't cured your cancer. So now we need to sacrifice a virgin to Pancuplagros. And wear these carrots to ward off evil." |
It becomes clear that there will be two sides in this movie.
On one side we have Father Rigid, his helper, and Annelisse’s parents who think
that an exorcism is the ONLY answer. Then we have Annelise’s German doctor, the
“scientist” that is with him, and his American film crew who may or may not be
scientists themselves. They all believe that Science is the ONLY answer. Note
the conspicuous lack of people who consider “Hey. What if we use both?!” And,
no, I do not remember one of their names. They do not deserve to be remembered.
FUN FACT: When yours truly went back to re-watch this movie,
Netflix had already taken it out to pasture and shot it to death.
RIP Movie (2011- 2014) .
But Team Science reports that they are spooked out because
when they were walking up the path to the house they turned around and saw
three-ish dead crows paving the path. Oh freaky. Not. Not even scary. (-1)
More tape cliché stuff with it messing up randomly and it
adds nothing. (-1) While Annelisse is sleeping, the doctor finds that all the
crosses in the house are turned upside down because apparently that is Satanic
and not at all how St. Peter was crucified, right? The priest, who is supposed
to know such things, also seems to think this is the work of a demon who has
nothing better to do than pretend to be a badass Satanist. (-1)
The main Camera Man seems to be swaying close to Team
Exorcism because “freaky shit” keeps happening. Such as Annelise’s bed
levitating and her speaking English. The scientist even screams “She speaks
English?!” Noooo. That’s a horrible
language! (-1) Did I mention the acting here is atrocious? I’ve seen Discovery
Channel documentaries with better dramatizations than this. (-1)
At this point the film begins to replay its old scenes like
a real documentary but isn’t bound together as well like a real one. So it
sucks at being a mockumentary, too. (-1)
The priest keeps insisting “There are no reasons for doctors
here…” because they had her for two years but weren’t helping? Okay, so
following that school of thought a cancer patient tried chemo therapy but the
cancer didn’t go away so they should just not do it anymore. Is that the idea?
Because that is kind of reckless, don’t you think? For the love of your God,
you can do your exorcisms with medical help, right? Is that really such a
difficult concept to grasp or is this movie just not sophisticated enough to
delve into those kind of nuances? Also, priest-man, does it occur to you that Annelisse
might be chronically mentally ill. Meaning, uh, there’s no cure. But she still
deserves TREATMENT. Treatment doesn’t always mean they are going to make a full recovery. But it makes life more
comfortable for the patient. Grow up. (-1) All the doctors and crew do is
complain and threaten to go to the authorities when they really should have as
soon as they caught wind of what was going on. (-1) The non-horror portion of
the film is spent making the doctors and scientists look stupid by having them
say again and again “I can’t explain it at the moment! I just can’t! I can’t!”
(-1) Someone actually yells “Enough of your mumbo-jumbo!” That’s like…a line
from a parody of exorcism movies. Are you kidding? (-1) The priest acts equally
moronic with lines like “How could she know English? She’s never left
Germany!” Uh…it’s called television. (-1)
When the doctor threatens to go to the authorities, the
priest tells the scientist/doctor off by saying because he’s been ordered by
the arch-diocese to perform this ritual, if the doctor goes to the authorities
he will be “laughed out of the court
room” because this parish is religious.
Uh….no, he wouldn’t. That would not happen. Anywhere in the world. Ever
since the start of the modern age. Come out of the Stone Age, Father
Flintstone. (-1) There is also an unfair depiction of the parents as buffoons.
(-1)One of the crew interrupts this riveting debate with a report of a
poltergeist upstairs. Note, he reports it. But we do not see it. (-1)
Rather than have Anneliese report this herself, Father
Flintstone annotates the end of Emily
Rose. (Seeing Mary, blah blah blah. That’s why the exorcisms have to continue.
So the world will believe in demons and good and evil. Blah blah blah BLAH!) Also, another point off because that would
ONLY make sense to a sad psychotic girl and the priest is riding it for his
ego’s sake. You’re not a hero. You’re an asshole. (-2)
During a violent exorcism, Annelisse spews more charming dialogue.
“You can take your medicine and shove it up your ass!” Oh, caustic, Annelisse!
So caustic!(-1) The film then cuts to black and uses recordings but no scene,
so we hear Annelisse speaking in tongues. L-A-Z-Y. (-1)
Making the doctors look stupid, the religious folk look like
asses and the demoniac look unbelievable isn’t helping you capture the
audience. In fact, most of the audience has probably left or fallen asleep by
now. Annalisse verbally berates the scientist and he freaks out. It takes very
little provocation. It is so sudden when he physically attacks her that it
belongs in one of the Scary Movie
sequels. (-1)
The actual exorcisms of the film blend together, different
only in the amount of Stupid that the two teams bring to them. One particularly
classy scene has the girl rip her nightgown off with Hulk-like strength because
nothing is more important than adding boobs to a movie like this. It’s all it
needs, right? Later she proceeds to pull a dead bird out from…under her pillow….and
bite its head off. Yum? Then she throws the priest with one hand. Because I
think all that scene needed was another bad stunt. Eventually Annelisse attacks
her German doctor and chokes him to death. Then she laughs like a girl, as
Satan is prone to do in these kinds of movies when his vessel is a young white
woman. (-1) The scene of the doctor’s death is the stupidest thing ever. The
priests keep praying and people do NOTHING. They don’t even TRY to pry her off
of him. (-1) Why is this such a non-event? Where is his body? What do they tell
the police? Do they just toss him outside and say nothing. What about his
family? Holy god! (-5)
Next we see her, Annelise is finally strapped down to the
bed. She’s been drinking her pee, slapping, scratching and attacking people for
YEARS and you only now just think to tie her down? (-1) The sole female member
of the camera crew is convinced to loosen one of Annelisse’s straps when she
asks her kindly. Then Annelisse grips her wrist and tells her off about her
deepest secret.
Film, you don’t know what atmosphere or tone even mean. And
you don’t DESERVE to bring up subjects like rape, child abuse and pedophilia in
your script. The camera woman, a victim of sexual abuse when she was a child,
is brought to tears by the demon who attacks her…just because, I guess, she
needs to die. But this film does not know how to handle the concept. So it
loses five whopping points for even attempting. As Horror Movie Satan would say “Go fuck
yourself.” (-5) The camera woman hangs herself, bringing the body count to five
in this shittastic film, and for no reason.
Next we see the priest slapping Anneliese and forcing her to
genuflect 600 times. Priest-Man, you know it’s a demon and not her so why would
slap her? Why would you torture her? We already know you’re an asshole who
recklessly ended a woman’s life with neglect but this is just gratuitous and
confuses an already messy script. (-5)
Team Science and Team Exorcism continue to spew out tripe about
an order from the diocese overriding these people’s need to report a fucking
MURDER and suicide. (-1) Also, in real life, Annelisse did blow out her knees and
need a wheelchair, so good job for reminding me about that, Movie. At this
point I’m just angry at you for dragging this families’ name even further into
the dirt. (-1)
Also, Team Science and Team Exorcism, it is illegal NOT to
report a murder if you know about it. You become an accessory to a crime if
not. Good job, dingbats. (-1) Why are you still shooting this “study” after
half your crew is dead? Who is actually shooting it at this point? Who in their
right mind would still be in that damn house unless they were an idiot? (-1)
Annelisse appears in a wheelchair to the angry camera man
who is, understandable, pissed off, that two people are dead. But she kills him
off camera because…hell, why not, right? Then the last standing Team Science member
appears filming himself in front of Annelisse’s bed so she can easily stab him
in the back. No, really. That’s what happens. He basically sets himself up for
a murder. But before he does that he turns himself over to “something more” in
the cheesiest conversion moment of all time. Anne stabs him in the back with a
butcher knife that she got from…Satan, I guess. She cuts herself a few times
before the priests appear to exorcise her, again, apparently not caring about
another dead body on the floor. She then dies and I am actually happy the most
annoying possessed person in a movie ever is fucking gone.
The film ends with another pseudo fact about Michel’s grave
being a place of pilgrimage for some Christians. This is true. But I will have
you note a few things at the end of this review in memory of the real
Annelisse. Who was a flesh and blood human like you and I, and not a horror
movie spectacle in a piece of shit story like this.
Cliché Scoreboard.
POSSESSION FLICK SCORE BOARD:
·
Victim: Young, White, Female, Helpless- check
(-1)
·
Horrors of the Female Form: -check (-2)
·
Projectile Vomit: Silly CGI spiders. Check (-1)
·
Cliché Demon Voice: Yes. And it’s not scary.
(-1)
·
Mental Illness is Scary (Ah!): Don’t really have
a chance to. But I’m sure it would have exploited it, had it the chance.
·
Troubled Non-believer and/or Science vs. Faith:
Check (-2)
·
Potty Mouth Demon: Check. (-1)
·
Whisper Lewd Things to Me, Satan (Horrors of
Female Sexuality): Yes. And how! (-1)
·
The Devil Does Yoga (+ if in a pretzel): Yes
(-1)
·
Spider Walk: Yes. (-1)
·
Imitating Emily Rose: (-3)
Other Cliché Points Off:
Other Cliché Points Off:
·
Based on True Story: -5 (Actually this film
CLAIMS to be ACTUAL FOOTAGE of what happened. So it loses 5 points right away).
·
Factual Errors if above is to be believed: -6
(This is the danger of claiming to be based on fact or, in this case, ACTUAL
found footage. Every time something is inaccurate you lose a point.)
·
Shaky camera: -1
·
Gross Out scares: -2
·
Lights Flicker Out cliché: -1
·
Pointless Poltergeists: -1
·
Pointless creepy singing: -1
·
Laughable special FXs: -2
·
Almost exact scene from Last Exorcism where
possessed girl plays with camera: -1
·
Pointlessly Big Body Count: -5
·
Off-Screen Scream cliché: -1
·
Scream into Camera cliché: -1
Grace Points
·
None. Absolutely none. You get no grace points,
movie.
Cliché Count: 11 out of 12 for main score.
Skipped Clichés: 1.
But it would have had insanity-phobia if it had the chance.
Other Negative cliché points: 27
Negative Points from Synopsis: 47
Overall negative points:74
Grace points: 0.
Your Score: 15.
IN MEMORY of the Real Annelisse Michel
I am not here to tell you that Miss Michel needs to be
canonized a saint or that I am insulted religiously by this. I am not a
religious person and I am not Christian. If I were to be completely truthful, I
will admit I was raised Roman Catholic, the same faith as Annelisse at the time
of her death. I was raised to believe that this kind of thing does happen, but very
rarely. In fact, many teachers in Catholic school told us never to jump to
conclusions about such a thing. It is dangerous. People die in attempted
exorcisms all the time. Catholic exorcisms are different from protestant
counterparts where a crowd watches a preacher drive out the negative forces in
celebratory triumph. A Catholic exorcism is rarely ever granted because a
series of proofs are required to even consider it. Can you blame them? Imagine
fanning the flame of a dangerously psychotic schizophrenic by addressing them
as “Satan.” Not a good idea. Belief in being possessed is an easy delusion to
encourage if you play along with it.
What I am here to tell you is that I understand. I
sympathize. And I certainly do not find tripe like this movie morally
forgivable. To turn the tragedy of such a person into one of the shittiest
horror movies of all time, to exploit the hype, to drag the sadness of her
family further into the dirt is not right.
It is not fair to the Church either. It gives the impression that all Catholics
are backwards thinking, anti-medicine asshats who would force a young woman to
genuflect until she ruptured her knees. People give films like The Exorcist a wrongful “anti-Catholic”
image. If you were to watch that original film you will see the nuances of its
suggestions and the role-model that Father Karras truly is. He is practical-minded,
forward-thinking and someone who understands that to help the victim of the
demonic possession, he must also apply his medical know-how. This “Science vs.
Religion” fight is a fairly new revival in the Possession Flick subgenre. All
that aside, let us look at who Annelisse really was.
She was an intelligent young woman who had begun her years
at college with hopes for the future, despite a disease that had begun to
hamper her. She was from a rather religious family. She lived in Germany. This
disease, her seizures and the pain, began to rob the future from her. Who would
not want there to be a meaning for
all this? Who would not want to feel like their pain meant something? What most
do not remember about this case is that Annelisse believed she was atoning for
the sins of others, much as saints of the past did. Did this erratic,
dangerous, delusional behavior make her psychotic? Probably. But does that give movie-makers the right to turn her
into this? No. It does not. Here is a
young woman who suffered greatly whether you believe there was some kind of
divine reason for it or whether it was purely mental illness brought on by the
crushing disappointment of losing her life to these painful seizures and
hallucinations. It does not matter which you believe. If you are going to mar a
person’s life so much, at least change the fucking title of your movie. And
painting the doctors as idiots and the priests as the heroes is more than a
little questionable. The fact stands that these priests were charged with
negligent homicide, a charge that was probably too light for them. When
Annelisse died she weighed less than 70 pounds, was dehydrated, her knees had
given out and she was missing teeth. Someone along the way made her problems
into questions of petty faith. And that is not forgivable. Let us not forget that her problems began after the release of The Exorcist and that the power of suggestion is stronger than
people realize.
When you push aside all the religious implications you also
have a mentally ill woman who has been turned into a kind of one-woman freak
show in horror movies. At least Emily Rose was a fictionalized story based on
the fact. Hell, even Requiem, which
is the most faithful to Michel’s story, changed her name. But this movie felt
like it had the right to use her name. This is morally repugnant. Not even a
century has passed from this person’s death before you degrade her name to
this. At least that pornographic Caligula
film was made thousands of years after his death. Before you make fun of crazy
people, maybe you should wait a while, right?
Rarely am I THIS harsh when I am seriously critiquing
something. I believe the fact that someone labored over something and made it
earns them points. And even the worst of movies entertain someone out there.
But this is insulting to a movie-watche’rs intelligence and insulting to me
personally on a mental level. Knowing what I do about the Michel case, and
having seen it handled with maturity in films like Requiem and, hell, even Exorcism
of Emily Rose, I cannot possibly pretend to find anything redeemable in
this pile of garbage. Leave it in Hell where it belongs. It is not even so bad
it is laughable. It is just plain bad.
Well, all that said. Here are the supposedly REAL recordings
from one of Michel’s exorcisms. Sweet dreams.
(A/N: Apparently people have a high horse complex when it comes to hotlinking images. So here are the same exact images without credit. Because, guess what, those images don't belong to you, even if you "made" them on your computer. They belong to the movie companies. <3 )
(A/N: Apparently people have a high horse complex when it comes to hotlinking images. So here are the same exact images without credit. Because, guess what, those images don't belong to you, even if you "made" them on your computer. They belong to the movie companies. <3 )
No comments:
Post a Comment